Einstein was opposed to the Creation of ‘Israel’

(1932-1949)

[Letters and excerpts from Albert Einstein’s writings in which he repeatedly reiterated his opposition to the creation of a state for Jews, preferring the formation of a simple spiritual and cultural centre to serve the Jewish world and all humanity.]

Addresses on reconstruction in Palestine (1932)

The crisis which the work of construction has had to face in the last few years has lain heavy upon us and is not yet completely surmounted. But the most recent reports show that the world, and especially the British government, is disposed to recognize the great things which lie behind our struggle for the Zionist ideal. Let us at this moment remember with gratitude our leader, Weizmann, whose zeal and circumspection helped the good cause to success.

The difficulties we have been through have also brought some good in their train. They have shown us once more how strong the bond is that unites the Jews of all countries in a common destiny. The crisis has also purified our attitude to the question of Palestine, purged it of the dross of nationalism. It has been clearly proclaimed that we are not seeking to create a political society, but that our aim is, in accordance with the old tradition of Jewry, a cultural one in the widest sense of the world. That being so, it is for us to solve the problem of living side by side with our brother the Arab in an open, generous, and worthy manner. We have here an opportunity to show what we have learned in the thousands of years of our martyrdom. If we choose the right path, we shall succeed and give the rest of the world a fine example.

[…]
We need to pay great attention to our relations with the Arabs. By cultivating these carefully we shall be able in the future to prevent things from becoming so dangerously strained that people can take advantage of them to provoke acts of hostility. This goal is perfectly within our reach, because our work of construction has been, and must continue to be, carried out in such a manner as to serve the real interests of the Arab population also.

In this way we shall be able to avoid getting ourselves quite so often into the position, disagreeable for Jews and Arabs alike, of having to call in the mandatory power as arbitrator. We shall thereby be following not merely the dictates of Providence but also our traditions, which alone give the Jewish community meaning and stability. For our community is not, and must never become, a political one; this is the only permanent source whence it can draw new strength and the only ground on which its existence can be justified.

[…]
The object which the leaders of Zionism have before their eyes is not a political but a social and cultural one. The community in Palestine must approach the social ideal of our fore-fathers as it is laid down in the Bible, and at the same time become a seat of modern intellectual life, a spiritual center for the Jews of the whole world. In accordance with this notion the establishment of a Jewish university in Jerusalem constitutes one of the most important aims of the Zionist organization.

25 January 1936

Dear Mrs. Leibowitz
It is indeed good that we Jews have a home in Palestine. There are also Jews who are quite smart, for instance Justice Brandeis, who see a Jewish future only in a unification of the Jews within a cohesive stretch of land. I, for my part, do not think so. I believe that the unique durability of the Jewish community is, to a large degree, based on our geographical dispersion, and the fact that we consequently do not possess instruments of power that will allow us to commit great stupidities out of national fanaticism. The persecutions will never cause us to perish.
Cordially Your
A Einstein

Our debt to Zionism (1938)

Just one more personal word on the question of partition. I should much rather see reasonable agreement with the Arabs on the basis of living together in peace than the creation of a Jewish state. Apart from practical considerations, my awareness of the essential nature of Judaism resists the idea of a Jewish state with borders, an army, and a measure of temporal power, no matter how modest. I am afraid of the inner damage Judaism will sustain, especially from the development of a narrow nationalism within our own ranks, against which we have already had to fight strongly, even without a Jewish state.

We are no longer the Jews of the Maccabee period. A return to a nation in the political sense of the word would be equivalent to turning away from the spiritualisation of our community which we owe to the genius of our prophets. If external necessity should, after all, compel us to assume this burden, let us bear it with tact and patience.

To
Mr. Henry J. Factor
P.O.B. 1273
Indianapolis, Indiana
January 21, 1946
Dear Sir:
I have served as a witness before the Anglo-American Inquiry Commission on Palestine for the sole purpose to act in favour of our just cause. But it is, of course, impossible to prevent distortion by the press. I am in favour of Palestine being developed as a Jewish Homeland but not as a separate State. It seems to me a matter of simple common sense that we cannot ask to be given the political rule over Palestine where two-thirds of the population are not Jewish. What we can and should ask is a secured bi-national status in Palestine with free immigration. If we ask more, we are damaging our own cause, and it is difficult for me to grasp that our Zionists are taking such an intransigent position, which can only impair our cause.
Very truly yours,

A Einstein

To Shepard Rifkin,
Executive Director of American Friends of the Fighters for the Freedom of Israel,
April 1948
Dear Sir,
When a real and final catastrophe should befall us in Palestine, the first responsible for it would be the British and the second responsible for it, the Terrorist organisations built [sic] up from our own ranks. I am not willing to see anybody associated with those misled and criminal people.
Sincerely yours,
Albert Einstein.

Note: This letter was written when news filtered through about the Deir Yassin massacre in West Jerusalem in April 1948. Around 120 terrorists from Menachem Begin’s Irgun and the Stern Gang (headed by another terrorist who went on to become prime minister of Israel, Yitzhak Shamir), entered the Palestinian village and slaughtered between 100 and 250 men, women, and children. There were also reports of rape, torture and mutilation.

The Jews of Israel (1949)

There is no problem of such overwhelming importance to us Jews as consolidating that which has been accomplished in Israel with amazing energy and an unequalled willingness for sacrifice. May the joy and admiration that fill us when we think of all that this small group of energetic and thoughtful people has achieved give us the strength to accept the great responsibility which the present situation has placed upon us.

When appraising the achievement, however, let us not lose sight of the cause to be served by this achievement: rescue of our endangered brethren, dispersed in many lands, by uniting them in Israel; creation of a community which conforms as closely as possible to the ethical ideals of our people as they have been formed in the course of a long history.

One of these ideals is peace, based on understanding and self-restraint, and not on violence. If we are imbued with this ideal, our joy becomes somewhat mingled with sadness, because our relations with the Arabs are far from this ideal at the present time. It may well be that we would have reached this ideal, had we been permitted to work out, undisturbed by others, our relations with our neighbours, for we want peace and we realize that our future development depends on peace.

It was much less our own fault or that of our neighbours than of the Mandatory Power that we did not achieve an undivided Palestine in which Jews and Arabs would live as equals, free, in peace. If one nation dominates other nations, as was the case in the British Mandate over Palestine, it can hardly avoid following the notorious device of Divide et Impera. In plain language, this means: create discord among the governed people so they will not unite in order to shake off the yoke imposed upon them. Well, the yoke has been removed, but the seed of dissension has borne fruit and may still do harm for some time to come –let us hope not for too long.

[Source: www.paranchy.org]

Back to Home Page

Frontier
Vol 58, No. 1, June 29 - Jul 5, 2025